![13 reasons why 2 deaths in 2 months 13 reasons why 2 deaths in 2 months](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/newscms/2018_20/2434421/180516-dylan-minnette-13-reasons-why-season-1-al-0939.jpg)
Since god is considered the creator and sustainer of the universe, it's helpful to point out that the universe doesn't need a creator or sustainer because it's eternal- even if it has a finite number of moments in what we'd consider our past. The failure of theists to come up with a coherent description of god is enough by itself to warrant atheism, but there's many more reasons to think no gods exist.Ģ) Since the universe is eternal no god could not have created it As such, a timeless, changeless being cannot do anything. It is logically impossible for change to exist without time.Ĭ. It is logically impossible to do something without change (even if everything is immaterial).
![13 reasons why 2 deaths in 2 months 13 reasons why 2 deaths in 2 months](https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/3/2020/06/Screenshot-2020-06-08-12.48.15-05b8424.png)
It is logically impossible to do something without doing something. Given the necessary rules of logic the traditional attributes of god are incoherent: It couldn't change into the state to want to change. But it isn't logically possible to exist timelessly and then suddenly jolt yourself into time out of your own will, because your will was timeless and frozen. Some theists think god is atemporal before creating the universe, and temporal after creating the universe. Once a theist agrees with this, they've cut themselves off from special pleading as an option. That is, god cannot do the logically impossible or be the logically impossible. That's why I like to get all theists to agree beforehand that god is not beyond logic. The theist's only resort here is special pleading. As a result, the traditional notion of god is self contradictory. A being that cannot do anything cannot be omnipotent. Doing requires a change, regardless of whether that change is mental or physical. And to create something, one must do something. Change requires time, and time requires change. The problem is that a timeless, changeless being by definition cannot do anything it's necessarily causally impotent and nonfunctional. There are some variations on this concept, but almost all traditional or classical theistic gods have these basic characteristics. The traditional notion of god in classical theism is that of a timeless, changeless, immaterial mind, who also must be infinitely good, infinitely wise, and can do anything logically possible. In order to even consider the possibility that a god exists, we first need a coherent concept of god. So here we go.ġ) The traditional notion of god isn't coherent Rather than write it in essay form, which I did in the original post, I'll instead outline the main reasons and arguments briefly, one by one. With each passing year I get much better at understanding the arguments for and against the existence of god, and since that post came out I've created several new arguments of my own. That post, which was long over due at the time, needs an update. More than three years ago I wrote a post entitled Why I'm An Atheist, where I briefly explained some of the reasons why I don't believe in god.